There’s a lot in the media at the moment concerning Artificial Intelligence, some hailing it as the next industrial revolution, others as Armageddon waiting to happen. I know science fiction over the years has been full of the latter. However, as any writer will tell you a good story needs conflict and in sci-fi what’s better than man vs. machine?. I also know that Stephen Hawking is suggesting we, or at least some of us, need to get of this planet before the end of the century and find a new home before AI becomes too powerful. I just don’t see why it has to be that way. Why does it have to be the alarmist view? Although, I admit neither I nor the professor will be around at that time, mores the pity. For the complete blog follow this link: http://wp.me/p3ycbY-1KR
It is all around us and we can't live without it. But who is running who? My latest blog: Information technology - who's in charge: http://wp.me/p3ycbY-1f4
In his recent articles Stephen Hawking thinks the development of artificial intelligence could spell doom for the human race. Others disagree and I'm with them. http://wp.me/p3ycbY-19t
In Sept 2013 I wrote a blog on this subject asking the question 'do we want them to look human?' I suggested the answer was 'no'. But, perhaps it's not that simple? This weeks blog: http://wp.me/p3ycbY-12O